I hope all of you not to choose this guy as an adviser.
irresponsible,haught,low academic ability.
I had ever told him I wanted a better mark(I was willing to do any thing to fix my thesis). But this guy just gave me a "4" without ANY ANY ANY EXPLANATION!! This resulted I was not eligible to do a Ph.D!!!(if it was "5", then I could)
The funny thing was, he told the vice dean that I didn't reply his e-mail?!!!! EXCUESE ME???? I sent about 46 emails, and this guy just sent about 35, how could this guy say that?
This guy is also haughty. When I saw my mark was 4, I asked him for a reason. This guy didn't give me an explanation angain!!!
About his academic ability: as you can see in his publication list, he 1999 finished Ph.D but has less papers and has no RPRESENTATIVE WORK. This guy totally has 12 papers, but 1999-now is 18 years. I wonder, would this guy get out and let other excellent postdoc fellow come in???
You, supervise me by low standards, but judge me with high standards? IS THIS FAIR?